Konstantin Chuychenko

I think, the term ‘regulatory guillotine’ does not fully and accurately describe what we do. Our goal is not to destroy the bad old, but to create the good new. And this good new should be of use for people, for those inspected. Our goal is to find balance between serving interests of society through respecting guarantees, rights, and legal interests of people and common sensible, optimal, reasonable monitoring and supervision activities, because we do not want to kill business and want to provide normal conditions not only for business, but for all those inspected

In all honesty, there is a great deal of doubt in my mind that these projects are of interest to business. That is because again, the challenge is twofold: on the one hand, it is about preservation, on the other hand, it is about bringing in the crowds. It can often be the case that one task precludes the other. Either that, or visitor restrictions need to be applied. Naturally, business cannot be run by such approaches. If a loan is taken out, then there is the question of breaking even, of a company fulfilling its obligations to the bank

Only those requirements that are really aimed at eliminating and neutralizing risks affecting the public interest should be the object of verification

The improvement of regulation and oversight must take place in two ways: in substantive and procedural legal respects. All the issues that regulate the substantive aspect must be taken from the law ‘On Regulation and Oversight’, thus introducing a clear separation of substantive and procedural law