A socially oriented non-financial development institution and a major organizer of international conventions, congress, exhibitions, business, social and sporting, public, and cultural events.

The Roscongress Foundation is a socially oriented non-financial development institution and a major organizer of international conventions; exhibitions; and business, public, sporting, and cultural events. It was established in pursuance of a decision by the President of the Russian Federation.

The Foundation was established in 2007 with the aim of facilitating the development of Russia’s economic potential, promoting its national interests, and strengthening the country’s image. One of the roles of the Foundation is to comprehensively evaluate, analyse, and cover issues on the Russian and global economic agendas. It also offers administrative services, provides promotional support for business projects and attracting investment, and helps foster social entrepreneurship and charitable initiatives.

Each year, the Foundation’s events draw participants from 208 countries and territories, with more than 15,000 media representatives working on-site at Roscongress’ various venues. The Foundation benefits from analytical and professional expertise provided by 5000 people working in Russia and abroad. In addition, it works in close cooperation with 160 economic partners; industrialists’ and entrepreneurs’ unions; and financial, trade, and business associations from 75 countries worldwide.

The Roscongress Foundation has Telegram channels in Russian (t.me/Roscongress), English (t.me/RoscongressDirect), and Spanish (t.me/RoscongressEsp). Official website and Information and Analytical System of the Roscongress Foundation: roscongress.org.

RC personal account
Восстановление пароля
Введите адрес электронной почты или телефон, указанные при регистрации. Вам будет отправлена инструкция по восстановлению пароля.
Некорректный формат электронной почты или телефона
Science is Doing What Politics Cannot Do
25 May 2018
The international climate is having a negative impact on collaboration in science and technology

The current political issues we are witnessing, alongside geopolitical confrontations and sanctions, are limiting opportunities for collaboration in science and technology. There are plenty of examples of this. As scientists, it is something we encounter. Take scientific cooperation with the US. Our access to their national laboratories is blocked – we’re simply not allowed in — Alexander Sergeev, President, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Collaborating is difficult when there is an absence of trust. Indeed, when the European Union tells us that islets of stability have been preserved and that science is safe, we understand the deception behind it. On the one hand, our collaboration with CERN, for example, is being curtailed, while on the other hand, funds are being allocated to improve scientists’ mobility. — Evelina Zakamskaya, Anchor, Russia 24.

Science is bridging political divides

Science can do a lot that politicians cannot. What’s more, science often works in defiance of political trends — Vladimir Fortov, Academician, the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Science is one step ahead of politics when it comes to identifying solutions to humanity’s problems, such as water security and food security — Markus Ederer, Ambassador of the European Union to the Russian Federation.

Global challenges are becoming ever more serious. <...> This is true of sustainable development and climate change. <...> I worked at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and we reached the conclusion that this was an area where scientists could work freely and collaborate very closely, without any major restrictions from the political arena — Rae Kwon Chung, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Science can often lay the foundation for political rapprochement. An example of this is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — Markus Ederer, Ambassador of the European Union to the Russian Federation.

In my opinion, sanctions – at any rate those which have affected our university – have strengthened our international ties. I can say that unequivocally. This is in relation to the International Council. — Vladimir Vasiliev, Rector, St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics .

Insufficient funding for the Russian Academy of Sciences

The amount of funding allocated to science in our country is 1.18% of GDP. That places us 30th in the world! <...> And this is at a time when there is an explosion of interest in science across the globe. — Vladimir Fortov, Academician, the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Science in Russia is lagging behind its global competitors

According to UNESCO, the number of scientific publications in China has increased 9.6 times over the last 15 years. In India, the increase is four-fold. In Russia, it’s 15%. <...> In terms of the number of scientists per 1,000 of the population, we rank around 23rd–24th. — Vladimir Fortov, Academician, the Russian Academy of Sciences.

The commercialization of science is hindering international cooperation

There are sectors where commercialization and competition for patents has a strong foothold. Politics is not the only force hindering collaboration today. Commercialization also hinders collaboration between scientists based in different countries, due to issues related to patents and industries — Rae Kwon Chung, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Differing views on global development held by politicians and scientists

The conflict between these forces – political strength, war, and power versus the human mind, the perception of who we are, why we’re here and where we are headed – will determine the existence of our planet and of humanity in the near future. I think this is the main issue to which we should direct our resources — Yuriy Balega, Vice-President, Russian Academy of Sciences.

A deficit of trust between science and society

The question of trust between scientists and society – in fact, of trust between people – has always been key element in the evolution of society, and will remain so. <...> Codes of validation and verification are not universally accepted. — Emmanuel Tric, President, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis.

Migration policy is hindering academic mobility

Bringing students and instructors here is a major problem. And bringing school teachers here from other countries is a particularly big problem. — Vyacheslav Nikonov, Chairman, Committee on Education and Science of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.

Openness in sharing scientific research

Twenty years ago, when I was working at the UN, I put forward the idea that governments could work together and facilitate collaboration in science and technology through distributing the results of research which had been publicly funded. <...> This could be a cornerstone of global collaboration — Rae Kwon Chung, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

Interaction between politicians and scientists to resolve global problems

Scientists are unlikely to overcome this barrier by themselves. <...> There needs to be the political will to open up the capabilities of laboratories, to allow an understanding of the entire logistics and movement chain. Essentially, this would be a shared international laboratory — Andrey Kaprin, Director, National Medical Research Radiological Centre.

Today’s politicians do not sufficiently employ science to achieve their aims. <...> Science can help politics, as it has the tools to dispel many of the fake statements which currently abound. — Riccardo Valentini, Nobel Peace Prize winner.

An inter-disciplinary approach to developing science

The objective has to be to <...> create a kind of globalization that is inclusive and open to all. It is necessary to develop and adapt specific competencies in this third industrial revolution – the era of artificial intelligence — Milano Jose, Director General, KEDGE Business School.

Increasing government support for science

If we are serious about academic mobility, if we are serious about properly equipping laboratories, then there absolutely needs to be a major increase in funding. In fact, it is something the President has spoken about in his May decrees — Vyacheslav Nikonov, Chairman, Committee on Education and Science of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.

First of all, the state must say that it values its scientists. — Dmitry Pushkar, Chief Urologist, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.

A pivot East for scientific collaboration

If we consider that today’s leaders in numerous scientific fields – and today’s undisputed leaders in education – are Asian countries which do not participate in this game, then a pivot East on the part of our scientific collaboration naturally has a very positive value — Vyacheslav Nikonov, Chairman, Committee on Education and Science of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.

The material was prepared by the Russian news agency TASS