A socially oriented non-financial development institution and a major organizer of nationwide and international conventions; exhibitions; and business, public, youth, sporting, and cultural events.

The Roscongress Foundation is a socially oriented non-financial development institution and a major organizer of nationwide and international conventions; exhibitions; and business, public, youth, sporting, and cultural events. It was established in pursuance of a decision by the President of the Russian Federation.

The Foundation was established in 2007 with the aim of facilitating the development of Russia’s economic potential, promoting its national interests, and strengthening the country’s image. One of the roles of the Foundation is to comprehensively evaluate, analyse, and cover issues on the Russian and global economic agendas. It also offers administrative services, provides promotional support for business projects and attracting investment, helps foster social entrepreneurship and charitable initiatives.

Each year, the Foundation’s events draw participants from 208 countries and territories, with more than 15,000 media representatives working on-site at Roscongress’ various venues. The Foundation benefits from analytical and professional expertise provided by 5,000 people working in Russia and abroad.

The Foundation works alongside various UN departments and other international organizations, and is building multi-format cooperation with 173 economic partners, including industrialists’ and entrepreneurs’ unions, financial, trade, and business associations from 78 countries worldwide, and 179 Russian public organizations, federal and legislative agencies, and federal subjects.

The Roscongress Foundation has Telegram channels in Russian t.me/Roscongress, English – t.me/RoscongressDirect, and Spanish t.me/RoscongressEsp. Official website and Information and Analytical System of the Roscongress Foundation: roscongress.org.

RC personal account
Восстановление пароля
Введите адрес электронной почты или телефон, указанные при регистрации. Вам будет отправлена инструкция по восстановлению пароля.
Некорректный формат электронной почты или телефона

Strong fiscal rules in the EU do not guarantee good fiscal health

According to the European Rating Agency (ERA) analysts, the EU countries have developed the strongest global fiscal framework. They use three types of fiscal rules: budget rules setting limits on government structural deficits (typically 0.5% GDP), debt rules setting limits on debt-to-GDP ratios (60%), and expenditure rules setting targets for the growth of government expenditures (based on the growth of potential GDP).

Eurozone countries have stronger fiscal frameworks. They all have at least a budget rule incorporated in their national legislatures. Some non-eurozone countries voluntarily opted to join the eurozone fiscal framework. Three non-eurozone countries, however, have no adequate fiscal rules at all.

Strength of the fiscal rules is highest in Italy and Spain. Bulgaria and Estonia are in third place. The weakest frameworks are present in the United Kingdom and Hungary.

The assessment of the compliance with the fiscal rules shows a very different picture compared to the strength of the fiscal rules. The lowest compliance is in Italy, followed by France and Spain. The compliance with fiscal rules is highest in Sweden followed by Malta and Ireland.

Based on their research, the experts have come to a conclusion that strong debt rules do not guarantee sound public finances. The relationship between the strength of the debt rules and the compliance with the EU benchmarks is very weak. According to ERA’s assessments, fiscal rule has a positive influence on sovereign creditworthiness but the experts also analyze the willingness of the governments to exploit the flexibilities of fiscal rules when assessing sovereign creditworthiness.

The authors also state that governments are less willing to comply with fiscal rules when unemployment is high. In fact, unemployment rate is the single biggest factor explaining the discrepancy between the fiscal rules strength and compliance with those fiscal rules.
Release date
Analytics on the topic